The operator's own fetch settles it. One record, both fields:
<app_qrzlog_status:1>N <qrzcom_qso_download_status:1>Y
QRZ says the QSO is NOT confirmed and sets the download field anyway — it marks
what was handed back, not what was confirmed. OpsLog read it as a confirmation,
so eighteen QSOs came back "UPDATED" and green, none of them confirmed on QRZ.
The site's own logbook page shows them without a star.
Only app_qrzlog_status = C counts now. The test that asserted otherwise is
corrected and carries the real record.
And the download now takes back what it wrongly gave: when QRZ explicitly says
not-confirmed and our log says confirmed, the flag is cleared and reported on
its own line. These QSOs count towards award slots, so leaving them green until
someone noticed was not an option — and nothing else in the app would ever have
undone them. Only on an explicit no: a record with no app_qrzlog_status is QRZ
saying nothing, and silence is not a retraction.
Reported: after a confirmation download they all turn to Y.
The test accepted qsl_rcvd = Y as a confirmation. That field is the operator's
OWN paper-QSL flag, which they uploaded to QRZ in the first place — so QRZ handed
it back and OpsLog read it as QRZ's answer. On a log full of paper cards that is
most of the log, which is exactly what was seen.
Only QRZ's own statement counts now: app_qrzlog_status = C, or the ADIF field
qrzcom_qso_download_status = Y that QRZ sets for it. LoTW and eQSL confirmations
are explicitly not accepted either — they are other services' answers, and the
column says QRZ.
This status feeds award slots, so a false Y is a QSO counted as confirmed when it
is not. That asymmetry is why the rule is narrow rather than generous, and the
test lists the negatives as deliberately as the positives.
The changelog warns that earlier downloads may already have set the column
wrongly — the fix stops it happening again but does not undo it.
rouggy