HAMLOG.online is a seventh external service: one API key, one ADIF record per
QSO, immediate / delayed / on-close like the rest. They publish no API
documentation, so the protocol is read from THEIR OWN client — the HAMLOG Agent
(github.com/hamlogonline/Agent), which is the authoritative source short of
asking them:
POST https://hamlog.online/api/agent/
{"ADIFADD": {"APIKEY": k, "ADIFDATA": record}} → {"STATUS":"OK"}
{"KEYSTATUS": {"APIKEY": k}} → {"STATUS":"OK","CALLSIGN":…}
Success is STATUS == OK, not "no ERROR field": their failure carries ERROR and
no STATUS, and reading an unknown reply — a proxy page, a maintenance notice —
as an acceptance is how a contact goes missing without anyone noticing.
KEYSTATUS buys something no other service here offers: the key can be checked
BEFORE the first QSO, and the answer names the account. A key pasted from
another callsign is caught in the settings panel rather than through a week of
silent refusals.
Their confirmations are also an award source now, ticked like LoTW rather than
expressed through "custom". It reads the ADIF extras, not a column: the standard
names a field for hamlog.EU and none for hamlog.ONLINE, and borrowing the other
site's field would write a falsehood into every exported log. Three plausible
key names from their own export are accepted too, so nobody has to rename a
column by hand after an export.
Yaesu gains antenna selection (AN), remembered per band — the antenna picked on
a band comes back with it, with no table to fill in anywhere. Rigs with one
socket never answer AN and never show the row; the log says which case it is.
And a serial port that is refused now names its likely holder. OmniRig stays
resident once activated and keeps the port of the rig configured in it, so a
native backend never gets it — "Serial port busy" alone accused nobody, and an
FTDX10 spent a morning being blamed for it.
Reported on a Xiegu G90. With the blue programming cable — three wires, no
modem lines — CAT works perfectly. Behind a DE-19, which carries audio, CAT and
PTT, the radio went into transmit the moment OpsLog connected and stayed there.
Windows raises DTR and RTS when a serial port is opened, and the DE-19 reads
them as PTT; Xiegu's own documentation asks for both low. The CI-V backend has
dropped them since it was written, for the same reason on Icom rigs with USB
SEND mapped to a line. Xiegu, Yaesu and Kenwood did not. They do now.
The second half of the report: WSJT-X through OpsLog's rigctld decoded fine and
never transmitted. Nothing was broken in that chain — set_ptt reaches the
backend, which sends the CI-V PTT command, which a G90 ignores. That is why
Xiegu keys on a hardware line instead. The backend can now do that: Settings →
CAT → Xiegu → how the rig is keyed (CI-V / RTS / DTR).
Untested here — no G90 in reach. The operator who reported it offered to try.
From F4JND's log: a rig sitting on 145.550 MHz FM produced status lines reading
16445550000, 8364550000, 5817408364 and 12640 Hz between good readings — the last
of those even resolved to a 6 cm band.
BCDToFreq treated the nibbles 0x0A..0x0F as the digits 10..15, so a byte stream
that had lost frame sync still decoded into a number. The same log shows why sync
was lost: PTT round trips timing out and a scope stream the rig kept rejecting
(0x27), both competing with the poll on one serial line.
Non-decimal nibbles are now refused. Each caller keeps its last good value rather
than publishing noise: the frequency reader returns an error, the sub-VFO reader
returns not-ok, and the scope keeps its previous edges. Garbage that LOOKS like a
frequency is worse than a refused frame — it reaches the display, the band slots
and eventually the log, and it is the operator who then has to disprove it.
The test builds its fixture with FreqToBCD rather than by hand, because my
hand-written one was byte-reversed and the test caught it.
This does NOT explain the white screen that was also reported, and I have not
claimed it does: it removes one source of absurd values reaching the UI, which is
worth doing on its own evidence.
Xiegu speaks CI-V with a reduced command set: frames, BCD encoding, addressing
and the opcodes for frequency, mode, PTT and split are Icom's, so this reuses
internal/cat/civ wholesale instead of re-deriving a codec.
It is a SEPARATE backend rather than the Icom one at address 0x70, because what
the two rigs do NOT share is the deciding part. The Icom backend reads the
spectrum scope, the DSP block, data mode via 1A 06 and the model id via 19 —
none of which a Xiegu implements. Pointed at a G90 it would poll every cycle for
answers that never come, and spend its silence tolerance on commands the radio
was never going to support.
Two consequences of the rig's smaller mode table are handled explicitly rather
than left to fail: there is no data mode, so a digital QSO is set to plain
sideband (what the operator does on the radio anyway) instead of being refused;
and the split TX frequency is NOT reported, because reading the unselected VFO
needs 0x25, which the Xiegu table does not list — a split flag carrying a wrong
TX frequency is worse than the flag alone, since the frequency is what gets
logged.
The published command table has rows that slipped during typesetting (0x07 and
0x0F share a block). Where it contradicts itself the Icom meaning is used, the
rest of the table matching Icom exactly, and every unexpected reply is logged
raw so a first on-air run settles it.
NOT yet verified on a radio.
rouggy