The catalog carried Japan's civil prefecture code (JIS X 0401) — 01 Hokkaido,
02 Aomori, 03 Iwate, 04 Miyagi — where the award uses the JARL's own numbering.
The two agree on the first three prefectures and then part company on 35 of the
remaining 44: Tokyo is 10 to the JARL and 13 to the government, Niigata 08
against 15, Toyama 28 against 16.
The names were right throughout, which is why nothing looked wrong: the award
matches on the prefecture NAME in the QTH, so it counted exactly the right
contacts. Only the number against each one was wrong — and that number is what
an operator writes on a JARL claim.
Renumbered by name from the official JARL list, so everything else each entry
carried travels with it. That includes the Tokyo spelling pattern, which had to
move from 13 to 10; left where it was it would have been matching QTHs for
Saitama.
Two digits throughout, as the JARL prints them. Not cosmetic: the codes are
strings, so "1" sorts between "09" and "10" and the reference list appeared in
an order no published list uses.
Version 2 on the definition, so this actually reaches people. An operator who
has not edited WAJA gets it at startup; one who has is offered it, since their
work outranks ours. Nobody has to re-import by hand.
Reported with the official JARL chart alongside the exported award.
rouggy
2941121f4b